Rivers v. Wright et al
| Shermarrie Rivers |
| Brad Hardie and Donecia Wright |
| 1:2019cv00916 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/21/19. (Marrujo, C)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on Shermarrie Rivers. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to 2655 W. Alamos #101, Fresno, CA 93705 by Shermarrie Rivers. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shermarrie Rivers. (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/16/19. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Non-Prisoner) (Marrujo, C)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, served on Shermarrie Rivers. (Marrujo, C) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shermarrie Rivers. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brad Hardie, Donecia Wright by Shermarrie Rivers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
