Martinez v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Mayreli Martinez
Defendant: Vision Precision Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv01002
Filed: July 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ENTRY ONLY), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/18/2019: In light of the pending motion to compel arbitration, the Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2019 is CONTINUED to 12/2/2019 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/17/2019. The #5 Motion to Compel currently set for 10/1/2019 is CONTINUED to 10/16/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Thorp, J)
August 14, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to COMPEL Individual Arbitration Defendant Vision Precision Holdings, LLC's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration by Vision Precision Holdings, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/1/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration, #2 Declaration of Nicole Quinn, #3 Proposed Order)(Barnett, Anne)
July 26, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Vision Precision Holdings, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD,. (Hernandez, Brittany)
July 23, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2019 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
July 22, 2019 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Vision Precision Holdings, LLC. (Hernandez, Brittany)
July 22, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court of Kern County, case number BCV-19-101374 by Vision Precision Holdings, LLC. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8368860) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Declaration of Hernandez, #4 Declaration of Aurilio, #5 Declaration of Quinn, #6 Proof of Service)(Hernandez, Brittany)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vision Precision Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Michele Haydel Gehrke
Represented By: Brittany M. Hernandez
Represented By: Mara D. Curtis
Represented By: Anne Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mayreli Martinez
Represented By: Gwendolyne Nicole Ousdahl
Represented By: Jill Marie Vecchi
Represented By: Matthew Evan Crawford
Represented By: David Thomas Mara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?