Avila v. Rue 21, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maria Avila
Defendant: Rue 21, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01040
Filed: July 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J O'Neill
Referring Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Anne Sweeney Jordan on behalf of Rue 21, Inc.. Attorney Jordan, Anne Sweeney added. (Jordan, Anne)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has reviewed preliminarily the papers filed in connection with the pending motion to remand #4 and finds the matter suitable for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing on that motion, currently set for 9/30/19, is VACATED. A written decision will issue as soon as is practicable in light of the Court's extraordinarily heavy caseload. The parties are warned that civil motions and trials set before district judges in this district are likely to experience significant delays due to judicial resource shortages. All parties are encouraged to reconsider magistrate judge consent signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on September 24, 2019. (Munoz, I)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 REPLY by Maria Avila re #4 MOTION to REMAND . (Leblanc, Melissa)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 OPPOSITION by Rue 21, Inc. to #4 MOTION to REMAND . (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(Cogbill, Karin)
August 29, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to REMAND by Maria Avila. Attorney Leblanc, Melissa Anne added. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Melissa LeBlanc In Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order)(Leblanc, Melissa)
August 9, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Rue 21, Inc.: Notice to District Court of Filing of Removal Papers in State Court. (Cogbill, Karin)
July 31, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S)
July 30, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County Superior Court, case number VCU277300 by rue21. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8382677) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proof of Service)(Cogbill, Karin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avila v. Rue 21, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rue 21, Inc.
Represented By: Angela Elizabeth Martinez
Represented By: Karin Morgan Cogbill
Represented By: Angela Elizabeth Meakin
Represented By: Anne Sweeney Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Avila
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Represented By: Melissa Anne Leblanc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?