(PC) Henley v. Burnes, et al.
Zuri Henley |
L. Xiong, Sgt. Burnes and M. Rodriguez |
1:2019cv01101 |
August 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to P.O. Box 3476, Corcoran, CA 93212 by Zuri Henley. (Flores, E) |
Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT by Zuri Henley.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Zuri Henley. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on COR.filings@cdcr.ca.gov. for Zuri Henley. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/13/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 9/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Zuri Henley. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Burnes, M. Rodriguez and L. Xiong by Zuri Henley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.