(SS) Sisco v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Edith Lillian Sisco |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv01277 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Marriott, Michael K. added. (Marriott, Michael)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Edith Lillian Sisco. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/26/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, DOJ, #2 Summons Executed on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX)(Zane, Helen)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL: Consent or Decline due by 12/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM Instructions) (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Helen R. Zane* *Law Offices of Helen Zane* *P.O. Box 1126* *Arcata, PA 95518*. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/13/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Edith Lillian Sisco. (Zane, Helen)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE : Attn: Helen R Zane *****Please re-file the Motion for Fee Waiver using Event: Motions and Related Filings/Motions/In Forma Pauperis to ensure that the fee waiver is properly ruled on. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Edith Lillian Sisco for attorney David F. Chermol to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8453579) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Zane, Helen)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul by Edith Lillian Sisco. Attorney Zane, Helen R added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Service on United States Attorney's Office, CAED, #3 Proposed Summons for Service on Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #4 Proposed Summons for Service on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, SSA, #5 IFP Motion)(Zane, Helen)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Sisco v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Marriott, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edith Lillian Sisco | |
| Represented By: | Helen R Zane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
