Meza v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Noreena Meza |
| Equifax Inc., Transunion Corp and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01303 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has deemed MOTION TO DISMISS, Doc. No. #14 , noticed for hearing on 11/18/2019, before Senior District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, suitable for decision WITHOUT oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). As such, the hearing on same is VACATED and the matter will be taken under submission as of that date. Minute order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/14/2019. (Gonzales, V)
|
| Filing 15 REPLY by Equifax Inc. re #14 Motion to Dismiss,. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to DISMISS by Equifax Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/18/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Neben, Katherine) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Neben, Katherine) |
| Filing 11 JOINDER by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. in. Attorney Neben, Katherine A. added. (Neben, Katherine) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #8 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/2019. (Kusamura, W)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order on Motion for Extension served on Noreena Meza. (Kusamura, W) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Equifax Inc.. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal, by Equifax Inc.. Attorney Quinn, Thomas Patrick added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Transunion Corp. (Morrigan, Kari) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER by Transunion Corp.(Morrigan, Kari) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Civil New Case Documents for AWI served on Noreena Meza. (Jessen, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Pro Hac Vice Order served on Noreena Meza. (Jessen, A) |
|
Filing 5
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/19/2019. Added attorney Kari A. Morrigan, PHV for Transunion Corp. (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Transunion Corp for attorney Kari A. Morrigan to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8466624) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Booth, Eileen) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Transunion Corp. (Booth, Eileen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/26/2019 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Fresno County Superior Court, case number 19CECG3248 by Noreena Meza. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8464362) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons to Trans Union, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Complaint to Transunion Corp, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Booth, Eileen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
