Newell v. Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc.
| Louis Newell |
| Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01314 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Franco Chavez, Olivia)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ensign United States Drilling (California) Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for LJO, #1 Notice of Removal,. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Proof of Service (Courtesy Copy to Kern County Superior Court))(Franco Chavez, Olivia)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2019 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kern County Superior Court, case number BCV-15-100367 by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8470725) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Franco Chavez, Olivia)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
