(HC) Hand v. Sawyer et al
| Jehu Hand |
| Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and Steven Merlak |
| 1:2019cv01329 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RECEIPT number CAE100044160 for $5.00 paid by Jehu Hand paid on 11/14/19 fbo Jehu Hand. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/31/2019. ( Case Management Deadline: 12/5/2019). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Jehu Hand. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Jehu Hand. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Petitioner's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Orozco, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jehu Hand. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jehu Hand. (Orozco, A)
|
|
Filing 1
(2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Steven Merlak, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer by Jehu Hand. (Orozco, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
