Buenrostro-Briano et al v. Locke et al
Jennifer Buenrostro-Briano and Maria Briano |
Darrell Locke, Luis Frausto-Vicencio and Francisco Pacheco |
1:2019cv01382 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Luis Frausto-Vicencio, Darrell Locke, Francisco Pacheco. (Longyear, Dayton) |
Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Luis Frausto-Vicencio, Darrell Locke, Francisco Pacheco. Attorney Longyear, Dayton Van Vranken added.(Longyear, Dayton) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Luis Frausto-Vicencio, Darrell Locke, Francisco Pacheco* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Patrick Matthew Buelna* *Law Offices of John Burris* *7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120* *Oakland, CA 94621*. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against Luis Frausto-Vicencio, Darrell Locke, Francisco Pacheco by Jennifer Buentrostro-Briano, Maria Briano. Attorney Buelna, Patrick Matthew added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8496742) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Buelna, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.