Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Strong Capital I, LP et al
| Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc. |
| Railroad Management Company, LLC, Railroad Management Company IV, LLC, Strong Capital I, LP and Union Pacific Railroad |
| 1:2019cv01386 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc.. (Zumwalt, Frank) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 10:00 AM in Yosemite (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Flores, E) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Railroad Management Company IV, LLC, Railroad Management Company, LLC, Strong Capital I, LP, Union Pacific Railroad* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Frank Zumwalt* *Zumwalt Law Firm, LLP* *1600 G Street, Suite 104* *Modesto, CA 95354*. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Plaintiffs by Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc.. Attorney Zumwalt, Frank Timothy added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8497549) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zumwalt, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
