Ambriz v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
| Blanca Ambriz and D. Ambriz |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01391 |
| October 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): On November 7, 2019 the Court filed an Order of Recusal (Doc. #9 ). Due to reassignment of the case, the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for January 9, 2020 before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto is RESET to January 16, 2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Judge McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (see attached), one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-01391-LJO-BAM, to be used on all future filings. The parties wishing to appear telephonically for said hearing, may do so with each partyusing the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 3190866. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/13/2019. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has reviewed preliminarily the papers filed in connection with the pending motion to dismiss #5 and finds the matter suitable for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing on that motion, currently set for November 13, 2019, is VACATED. A written decision will issue as soon as is practicable in light of the Court's extraordinarily heavy caseload. The parties are warned that civil motions and trials set before district judges in this district are likely to experience significant delays due to judicial resource shortages. All parties are encouraged to reconsider magistrate judge consent signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 7, 2019. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER of Recusal; New case number 1: 19-cv-1391 LJO-BAM, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/7/2019. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 8
REPLY by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. to RESPONSE to #5 Motion to Dismiss. (Warren, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 7
OPPOSITION by Blanca Ambriz to #5 Motion to Dismiss. (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 6
PROPOSED ORDER re Motion to Dismiss re #5 MOTION to DISMISS by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Warren, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to DISMISS by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/13/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Warren, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Warren, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of REMOVAL by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8499593) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties, #2 Declaration of Marissa A. Warren, #3 Declaration of Melanie Luker, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D)(Warren, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Warren, Marissa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
