Jackson v. USOPM/Legal Reconsideration & Appeals
| Deborah Lynn Jackson and Debra Lynn Jackson |
| USOPM/Legal Reconsideration & Appeals |
| 1:2019cv01452 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/20/19. (Marrujo, C)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Debra Lynn Jackson. (Marrujo, C) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Debra Lynn Jackson. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/17/2019. Motion for IFP or Filing Fee due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Deborah Lynn Jackson. (Jessen, A) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deborah Lynn Jackson. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USOPM/Legal Reconsideration & Appeals by Deborah Lynn Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
