Walker v. Police Chief et al
| Harold Walker |
| Andrew Menard, Jasmine Arreola, Janet May, Garcia, Jose Arellano, Primitivo Diaz, Yanet Santiago, Adam Estrada, Jason Laird and Police Chief |
| 1:2019cv01546 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Lawrence J O'Neill |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
FIRST SCREENING ORDER #1 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/11/2019. First Amended Complaint due by 1/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form). (Lundstrom, T)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on Harold Walker. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to 1584 W. Orleans Avenue, Fresno, CA 93706 by Harold Walker. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Harold Walker. (Sant Agata, S) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Harold Walker. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Harold Walker. (Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
