(PC) Jongpil Park v. Kitt et al
Plaintiff: Jongpil Park
Defendant: Victor V. Kitt and Adventist Health-Bakersfield
Case Number: 1:2019cv01551
Filed: October 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT Consent or Decline due by 1/27/2020 signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/23/2019. (Orozco, A)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Jongpil Park. (Orozco, A)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/05/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Orozco, A)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Jongpil Park. (Orozco, A)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Jongpil Park. (Orozco, A)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Jongpil Park, CDC G-50844 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on SATF. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/31/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 12/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Martin-Gill, S)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jongpil Park. (Martin-Gill, S)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Adventist Health-Bakersfield, Victor V. Kitt by Jongpil Park. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Jongpil Park v. Kitt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victor V. Kitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adventist Health-Bakersfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jongpil Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?