(PC) Arthur Vanzuylen v. Taylor et al
Plaintiff: Arthur Vanzuylen
Defendant: Zachary Taylor, U. Baniga and S. Gates
Case Number: 1:2019cv01562
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Referring Judge: Lawrence J O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-1562 LJO-EPG (PC). (Martin-Gill, S)
November 15, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Arthur Vanzuylen. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 14, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/06/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application -Prisoner) (Martin-Gill, S)
November 6, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Arthur Vanzuylen. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 5, 2019 Filing 3 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on CCI-Tehachapi. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 5, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *11/1/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 12/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Martin-Gill, S)
November 4, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arthur Vanzuylen. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 1, 2019 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against U. Baniga, S. Gates, Zachary Taylor by Arthur Vanzuylen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Arthur Vanzuylen v. Taylor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Vanzuylen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U. Baniga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?