(PC) Sharp v. Carter
| Anthony A. Sharp |
| Jack Carter |
| 1:2019cv01568 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's "Wish to Dismiss this Action," Construed as a #7 Request for Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/19/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Orozco, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Dismiss, served on Anthony A. Sharp. (Orozco, A) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS by Anthony A. Sharp. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge to Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED re #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/7/2019. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is 1:19-cv-01568-DAD-SAB (PC). Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations served on Anthony A. Sharp. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Anthony A. Sharp. (Orozco, A) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Anthony A. Sharp, CDC K-41609 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint served on Anthony A. Sharp. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Anthony A. Sharp. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Jack Carter by Anthony A. Sharp. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Sharp v. Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony A. Sharp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jack Carter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
