Trujillo v. Conrad, et al.
Jose Trujillo |
Jose Ramirez, Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P., Ramirez-Vazquez, Inc., Italian Cafe Gourmet Food Service, Inc, BBD Los Banos Management LLC, Ethan Conrad, J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Ramirez-Vazquez, Inc. Doing business as La Esperanza Mercado Y Carniceria, Jose Ramirez Doing business as La Esperanza Mercado Y Carniceria, Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P. Doing business as Black Bear Diner, J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Doing business as JCPenney, Italian Cafe Gourmet Food Service, Inc Doing business as Wienerschnitzel #858 and BBD Los Banos Management LLC Doing business as Black Bear Diner |
1:2019cv01627 |
November 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Anthony W Ishii |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P. served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 13 ANSWER with Jury Demand by J. C. Penney Company, Inc..(Roth, David) |
Filing 12 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/27/2019. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before January 10, 2020. (Gonzales, V) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants BBD Los Banos Management LLC, Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P.. (Parker, Alden) |
Filing 10 ANSWER by BBD Los Banos Management LLC, Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P.. Attorney Parker, Alden John added.(Parker, Alden) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by J. C. Penney Company, Inc.. Attorney Roth, David Vincent added. (Roth, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: BBD Los Banos Management LLC served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: J. C. Penney Company, Inc. served on 12/6/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Ethan Conrad served on 12/11/2019, answer due 1/2/2020. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Tanya E. Moore. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/18/2020 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Jose Ramirez, Ramirez-Vazquez, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *332 North Second Street* *San Jose, CA 95112*. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *BBD Los Banos Management LLC, Black Bear Diner Los Banos, L.P., Ethan Conrad, Italian Cafe Gourmet Food Service, Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *332 North Second Street* *San Jose, CA 95112*. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Trujillo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8567412) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.