(SS) Hanks v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Debra Kae Hanks |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv01656 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jenkins, Chantal) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lambert, Meghan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/5/2019, answer due 2/3/2020. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Debra Kae Hanks pursuant to order of the court. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Debra Kae Hanks pursuant to order of the court. (Lambert, Meghan) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 2/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM-285 Forms) (Flores, E)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Meghan O. Lambert* *Osterhout Berger Disability Law* *521 Cedar Way, Suite 200* *Oakmont, PA 15139*. (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/26/2019. (Flores, E)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Debra Kae Hanks. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lambert, Meghan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Debra Kae Hanks. Attorney Lambert, Meghan O. added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Lambert, Meghan) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Hanks v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Chantal Jenkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Kae Hanks | |
| Represented By: | Meghan O. Lambert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
