(SS) Gillaspy v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Shawn Gregory Gillaspy |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv01666 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Holmberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Shawn Gregory Gillaspy. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/17/2019, answer due 2/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Holmberg, Matthew) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 3/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 SAB SOC SEC, #2 Consent Form) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Matthew Franklin Holmberg* *Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *12631 E. Imperial Highway, Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP : ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Issue Summons and USM to Serve a copy of Complaint, Summons and this Order upon the Defendant if requested by the Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 USM SS Instructions) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shawn Gregory Gillaspy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holmberg, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Review of The Final Decision Of The Social Security against Andrew Saul by Shawn Gregory Gillaspy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of Interested Parties)(Holmberg, Matthew) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Gillaspy v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shawn Gregory Gillaspy | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Franklin Holmberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Marriott, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
