Younger-Condell v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
| Tammishia Younger-Condell |
| Robert L Wilkie, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
| 1:2019cv01668 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Tammishia Younger-Condell. All Defendants. (Bailey, Rachele) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/27/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Secretary of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert L Wilkie* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Rachele Berglund Bailey* *Herr Pedersen & Berglund, LLP* *100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300* *Visalia, CA 93291-1351*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Tammishia Younger-Condell (Bailey, Rachele) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Tammishia Younger-Condell. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8591956) (Bailey, Rachele) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
