(PC) De'Armond, Jr. v. White
Case Number: 1:2019cv01695
Filed: December 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING 46 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 01/04/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to grant Defendant's exhaustion-based Motion for Summary Judgment 42 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 12/1/2022. Referred to Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 39 Ex Parte Motion to Modify Amended Scheduling Order for Deadline to File Exhaustion Based Summary Judgment Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 9/4/2021. Deadline to File Motion for Summary Judgment on Exhaustion: November 5, 2021. (Sant Agata, S)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Lifting Stay; Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 6/3/2021. Exhaustion Motion Filing DDL: 9/6/2021; Discovery DDL: 2/2/2022; Dispositive Motion Filing DDL: 5/3/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING 31 Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings; ORDER DENYING 33 Defendant's Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 3/8/2021. Case stayed. Defendant shall file a status report due within ninety (90) days from the date of service of this order, and every sixty (60) days thereafter. (Rivera, O)
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File Motion Opting Out of Early Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/7/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to sch edule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Lawrence Bragg signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/12/2020. (cc: Lawrence Bragg)(), ( Settlement Conference set for 9/15/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.) (Lundstrom, T)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to submit Application to proceed In Forma Paupers or pay filing fee within 45-Days signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/10/2019. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application). (Lundstrom, T)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:19-cv-2353 KJN) to Fresno (1:19-cv-1695 JDP) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/04/19. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) De'Armond, Jr. v. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?