(HC) Gonzalez v. Fisher
Armando Jacobo Gonzalez |
Fisher |
1:2019cv01731 |
December 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER UNASSIGNING DISTRICT JUDGE signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the inactive senior status of District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, this action is hereby unassigned until a new district judge is appointed. The parties are referred to the attached Standing Order in Light of Ongoing Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Unassigning District Judge, served on Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 9 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/13/2020. Show Cause Response due 14-Day Deadline. (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order to Show Cause served on Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER TERMINATING #6 Motion to Proceed IFP : Order authorizing has been issued in Order #3 . (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-01731 LJO-JDP. (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Armando Jacobo Gonzalez signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/13/2019. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 (2254) PETITION, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Fisher by Armando Jacobo Gonzalez. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Gonzalez v. Fisher | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Fisher | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Armando Jacobo Gonzalez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.