(SS) Singh v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sandra Singh |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv01791 |
| December 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/24/2020, answer due 3/24/2020. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Illarmo, Marcelo) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Sandra Singh pursuant to order of the court. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Frs SS Sch Order, #2 Consent Form) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP ; ORDER DIRECTING to Issue a Summons; ORDER DIRECTING the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon the defendant as directed by the plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/27/19. (Attachments: #1 USM SS Instructions) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Orozco, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Sandra Singh. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Sandra Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Singh v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Marcelo N. Illarmo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sandra Singh | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
