U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. MG Luna, Inc.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
MG Luna, Inc. |
1:2019mc00008 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re #7 Stipulation and Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,. (Mugridge, James) |
Filing 7 Stipulated Order (1) requiring partial production in compliance with the EEOC's subpoenas; (2) VACATING hearing and briefing schedule; and (3) requiring the parties to file a joint status update by April 15, 2019, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/25/2019. (Rosales, O.) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Partial Production in Complaince with EEOC Subpoenas and Vacating Briefing Schedule and Hearing by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Requiring Partial Production in Compliance with EEOC Subpoenas and Vacating Briefing Schedule and Hearing)(Mugridge, James) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Service to Respondent of Documents Related to EEOC's Application to Show Cause by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re #4 Order to Show Cause,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proof of Service)(Mugridge, James) |
Filing 4 Order to Show Cause why the EEOC's Subpoenas should not be enforced, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/4/2019. Petitioner shall serve Respondent by 2/22/2019; Response due by 3/22/2019; Reply due by 4/5/2019; Show Cause Hearing set for 4/12/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean (Rosales, O.) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER re to Show Cause re #1 Petition, by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Mugridge, James) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED ORDER re Show Cause Why Subpoenas Should Not Be Enforced re #1 Petition, Miscellaneous Case by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Mugridge, James) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Order to Show Cause Why Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Attorney Mugridge, James added. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of EEOC Attorney James R. Mugridge, #3 Exhibits A-C, #4 Exhibits D-F, #5 Exhibits G-H, #6 Exhibits I-M, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mugridge, James) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED. (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. MG Luna, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
Represented By: | Anna Y Park |
Represented By: | James Mugridge |
Represented By: | Rumduol Vuong, GOVT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MG Luna, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.