Graham v. The Hertz Corporation
Mark Graham |
The Hertz Corporation |
1:2020at00167 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Hertz Corporation by Mark Graham. Attorney Mauro, Gregory Esteban added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8775362) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet re Mark Graham v. The Hertz Corporation)(Mauro, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Graham v. The Hertz Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Graham | |
Represented By: | Gregory Esteban Mauro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Hertz Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.