SHEPARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF MODESTO, LLC et al
| Nicholas SHEPARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated |
| DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF MODESTO, LLC and ABM GENERAL SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2020at00396 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants ABM GENERAL SERVICES, INC., FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF MODESTO, LLC. (Palmer, Jared) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Stanislaus County Superior Court, case number CV-20-002203 by Nicholas SHEPARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8919262) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Declaration of Jared Palmer in Support of Removal, #6 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Jared Palmer, #7 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Jared Palmer, #8 Declaration of Linda Jones in Support of Removal, #9 Declaration of Utamu Lackey in Support of Removal, #10 Declaration of Allison Nelson in Support of Removal)(Palmer, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
