(PC) Justus v. Delacruz et al
| Charles Justus, IV |
| S. Higuera, A. Delacruz, T. Lascina and G. Sanchez |
| 1:2020cv00241 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Charles Justus, IV. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Stanley A. Boone* to * Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin* for all further proceedings. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on Charles Justus IV. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 9
SCREENING ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to File an Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/25/2020. First Amended Complaint due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form). (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Rivera, O)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Charles Justus IV. (Rivera, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Screening Order served on Charles Justus IV. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Charles Justus, IV. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/19/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Charles Justus IV. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Charles Justus, IV, CDC AM-5088 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Rivera, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Charles Justus IV. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Charles Justus. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Charles Justus. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against A. Delacruz, S. Higuera, T. Lascina, G. Sanchez by Charles Justus. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
