(PC) Paul E. Duran v. Longoria
Paul Edward Duran |
Longoria |
1:2020cv00289 |
February 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/8/2020. First Amended Complaint due within sixty (60) days. (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order on Motion for Extension served on Paul Edward Duran. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 9 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to File Amended Complaint by Paul Edward Duran. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Barbara A. McAuliffe* to * Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson* for all further proceedings. (Marrujo, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on Paul Edward Duran. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 6 SCREENING ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to File an Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/9/2020. Amended Complaint or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal due within 30 days. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form)(Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Screening Order served on Paul Edward Duran. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Paul Edward Duran. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on CSP-Corcoran. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *2/25/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 4/2/2020 (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Paul Edward Duran. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Longoria by Paul Edward Duran. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PC) Paul E. Duran v. Longoria | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Longoria | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Paul Edward Duran | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.