Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
| Steve Steward |
| Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
| 1:2020cv00325 |
| March 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Wang, Jenny) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (Wang, Jenny) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston.(Wang, Jenny) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Brehm, Brent) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION For Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. Attorney Wang, Jenny H. added. (Wang, Jenny) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (Brehm, Brent) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Flores, E) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Brent D. Brehm* *Kantor & Kantor LLP* *19839 Nordhoff St.* *Northridge, CA 91324*. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston by Steve Steward.(Brehm, Brent) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Steve Steward. Attorney Brehm, Brent D. added. (Brehm, Brent) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Steven Steward (Brehm, Brent) |
| RECEIPT number 0972-8773136 for $400.00 fbo Steve Steward from Brent D. Brehm. (Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steward v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston | |
| Represented By: | Zoya Y. Yarnykh |
| Represented By: | Jenny H. Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve Steward | |
| Represented By: | Brent D. Brehm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
