(PC) Weston v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff: John F. Weston
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Case Number: 1:2020cv00326
Filed: March 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary S Austin
Referring Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/20/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on John F. Weston. (Sant Agata, S)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Stanley A. Boone* to * Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin* for all further proceedings. (Sant Agata, S)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on John F. Weston. (Sant Agata, S)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/17/20. (Attachments: #1 Motion for IFP) (Gonzalez, R)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on John F. Weston. (Gonzalez, R)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Valley State Prison. (Flores, E)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *3/3/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 4/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Flores, E)
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by John F. Weston. (Flores, E)
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation by John F. Weston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Weston v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John F. Weston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?