(HC) Hasan v. Jennings, et al.
| Mohammad Tajbir Hasan |
| Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, David Jennings, Nathan Allen and Matthew T. Albence |
| 1:2020cv00554 |
| April 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-00554-DAD-JDP (HC). (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Mohammad Tajbir Hasan. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support of TRO, #2 Declaration of Amy Lenhert, #3 Exhibit A to Amy Lenhert Decl., #4 Exhibit B to Amy Lenhert Decl., #5 Exhibit C to Amy Lenhert Decl., #6 Exhibit D to Amy Lenhert Decl., #7 Exhibit E to Amy Lenhert Decl., #8 Exhibit F to Amy Lenhert Decl., #9 Proposed Order Granting TRO, #10 TRO Checklist)(Lenhert, Amy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Mohammad Tajbir Hasan. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number 0972-8849727) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lenhert, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
