(HC) Thomas J. Shadden, Jr. v. Sexton
| Thomas J. Shadden, Jr |
| Michael Sexton |
| 1:2020cv00604 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT dated *6/18/2020* pursuant to order (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ; ORDER DENYING #7 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL ;The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/18/2020. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Judgment, #8 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, served on Thomas J. Shadden Jr. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL / OBJECTIONS to #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Thomas J. Shadden, Jr. (Rivera, O) |
|
Filing 6
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/21/2020. Objections to F&R due within THIRTY DAYS. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-00604-DAD-SAB. (Marrujo, C) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations, #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Thomas J. Shadden Jr. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 6/1/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Thomas J. Shadden, Jr., signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/29/20. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Michael Sexton by Thomas J. Shadden, Jr.(Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #2 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Thomas J. Shadden Jr. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Thomas J. Shadden, Jr. v. Sexton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas J. Shadden, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Sexton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
