(HC) Slaven v. The People of the State of California
Petitioner: Leonard A. Slaven
Respondent: The People of the State of California
Case Number: 1:2020cv00606
Filed: April 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony W Ishii
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #7 by Petitioner Leonard A. Slaven. (Jessen, A)
May 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the habeas corpus petition be summarily dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Leonard A. Slaven ; referred to Judge Ishii, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/18/2020. Objections to F&R due 30-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S)
May 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-00606 AWI-JLT (HC). (Martin-Gill, S)
May 19, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Leonard A. Slaven. (Martin-Gill, S)
May 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 6/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Leonard Slaven, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/29/2020. #2 Motion to Proceed IFP Authorized. (Marrujo, C)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Leonard A. Slaven. (Marrujo, C)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against The People of the State of California by Leonard A. Slaven. (Marrujo, C)
April 29, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Leonard A. Slaven. (Marrujo, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Slaven v. The People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leonard A. Slaven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?