(PC) Torres v. May et al
| Arthur Torres |
| Scott Frauenheim, Daniel May and Aaron Shimmin |
| 1:2020cv00839 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendant(s) Daniel May, Aaron Shimmin, Scott Frauenheim,. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Scott Frauenheim, Daniel May, Aaron Shimmin* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Arthur Torres* *T-26752* *P.O. Box 8500* *Coalinga, CA 93210*. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 10
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendant(s): *Daniel May*, *Aaron Shimmin*,*Scott Frauenheim*, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/16/2020. Operative Complaint, Summons, Notice of E-Service Waiver and this Order served via email on CDCR. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate, served on Arthur Torres. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 9
SCREENING ORDER as to #8 ; ORDER Allowing Case to Proceed on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against Defendants May, Shimmin, and Frauenheim, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/15/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order served on Arthur Torres. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Arthur Torres. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O) |
|
Filing 6
SCREENING ORDER; ORDER for Plaintiff to: (1) FILE a First Amended Complaint; or (2) NOTIFY the Court That He Wants to Stand on His Complaint, Subject to This Court Issuing Findings and Recommendations to a District Judge Consistent With This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/22/2020. Amended Complaint or Notice due within thirty (30) days. (Rivera, O)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Screening Order served on Arthur Torres. (Rivera, O) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Jessen, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Arthur Torres. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENTS SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Pleasant Valley State Prison. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *6/17/2020*; Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arthur Torres. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Scott Frauenheim, Daniel May, Aaron Shimmin by Arthur Torres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
