County of Kern v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: County of Kern
Defendant: Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv00853
Filed: June 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony W Ishii
Referring Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has deemed the MOTION TO DISMISS, Doc. No. #8 , noticed for hearing on 8/10/2020, before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, suitable for decision WITHOUT oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). As such, the hearing on same is VACATED and the matter will be taken under submission as of that date. Minute order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/5/2020. (Gonzales, V)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY by Tyler Technologies, Inc. re #8 Motion to Dismiss, #14 Opposition to Motion. (Haycock, Jason)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The MOTION TO DISMISS, Doc. No. #8 currently set for 7/30/2020 before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson is RESET for 8/10/2020 at 01:30 PM, before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Minute order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/20/2020. (Gonzales, V) (Gonzales, V)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ANSWER by County of Kern.(Ridley, Eileen)
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPPOSITION by County of Kern to #8 Motion to Dismiss. (Ridley, Eileen)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Granting #7 Application to Appear PRO HAC VICE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/26/2020. Added attorney Beth W. Petronio, PHV for Tyler Technologies. (Marrujo, C)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Ridley, Eileen)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM against County of Kern by Tyler Technologies, Inc.. by Tyler Technologies, Inc..(Haycock, Jason)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECLARATION of Jonathan Theonugraha in support of #8 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Haycock, Jason)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Tyler Technologies, Inc. in SUPPORT of #8 Motion to Dismiss. (Haycock, Jason)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS by Tyler Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/30/2020 at 02:00 PM in Yosemite (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Haycock, Jason)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Tyler Technologies, Inc. for attorney Beth Petronio to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8961361) (Haycock, Jason)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Tyler Technologies, Inc.. (Haycock, Jason)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Tyler Technologies, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Haycock, Jason)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2020 at 10:30 AM in Yosemite (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Jessen, A)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Haycock, Jason)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE to Jason Nathaniel Haycock: Under Local Rule 200, every complaint, amended complaint, or other document initiating a civil action shall be accompanied by a completed civil cover sheet, on a form available from the Clerk and on the Court's website. Please file your civil cover sheet. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444, or refer to the CM/ECF User's Manual on the court's website. (Marrujo, C)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kern County Superior Court, case number BCV-20-101197 by Tyler Technologies, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8950929) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Haycock, Jason) Duplicate payment filed; refunded receipt 0972-8950703 Modified on 6/22/2020 (Woodson, A).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: County of Kern v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: County of Kern
Represented By: Alan Ouellette
Represented By: Eileen R. Ridley
Represented By: Jaime Dorenbaum
Represented By: Andrew C. Thomson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Jason Nathaniel Haycock
Represented By: Jonathan Theonugraha
Represented By: Beth W. Petronio, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?