(PC) Clark v. Eaton, et al.
| 1:2020cv00874 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations; ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED due to plaintiffs failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/8/2020. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge to Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be Dismissed, Without Prejudice, for Failure to Obey a Court Order and for Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute this Action re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/5/2020. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:20-cv-1159-EFB) to Fresno (1:20-cv-0874-BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/24/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Clark v. Eaton, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
