Taylor v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
| Cheri Taylor |
| Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| 1:2020cv00881 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Hess, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Hess, Robert) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER by Unum Life Insurance Company of America.(Hess, Robert) |
Filing 7
ORDER VACATING ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE OF STATUS OF DEFENDANT OR A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/31/2020. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE OF STATUS OF DEFENDANT OR A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of entry of this order, Plaintiff shall either file a request for entry of default or a notice informing the Court of the status of the Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/31/2020. (Hernandez, M)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Unum Life Insurance Company of America served on 7/1/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. (Schwam, Bernard) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, -- Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (By Not More Than 28 Days) by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. Attorney Hess, Robert Edward added. (Hess, Robert) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Unum Life Insurance Company of America* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Bernard Richard Schwam* *Law Offices of Bernard R. Schwam* *16133 Ventura Blvd., Penthouse* *Encino, CA 91436*. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/11/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 VDRP) (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unum Life Insurance Company of America by Cheri Taylor. Attorney Schwam, Bernard Richard added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8961596) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested Parties)(Schwam, Bernard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Robert Edward Hess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cheri Taylor | |
| Represented By: | Bernard Richard Schwam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
