(SS) Chamberlain v. Commissioner of Social Security
Rain Chamberlain and Rain Emery Chamberlain |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2020cv00934 |
July 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The stay pursuant to General Order Number 615 is temporarily lifted for the limited purposes of addressing the pending application to proceed in forma pauperis, issuing the summons, and allowing Plaintiff to effectuate service of process. Minute Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/2/2020. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER: The parties are hereby notified that pursuant to General Order Number 615, attached hereto, this action has been stayed pending further order of the court. See E.D. Cal. G.O. No. 615, 6, 10. Minute Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/7/2020. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rain Chamberlain. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Rain Chamberlain. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.