Al Pato, et al. v. Barr, et al.
Nahrain Al Pato and Yokhanna Khames |
USCIS, Ken Cuccinelli and William Barr |
1:2020cv00973 |
July 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for William Barr,Audrey Benison Hemesath, GOVT for Ken Cuccinelli (Hemesath, Audrey) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Nahrain Al Pato, Yokhanna Khames. All Defendants. (Morrison, Curtis) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *William Barr, Ken Cuccinelli, USCIS* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Curtis L Morrison* *Law Office of Curtis Morrison* *P.O Box 7140* *Huntington Beach, CA 92615*. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants by NAHRAIN AL PATO, YOKHANNA KHAMES. Attorney Morrison, Curtis L added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8992013) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.