(HC) Rood v. Department of Corrections
1:2020cv01018 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment and Close Case, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/4/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 41 ORDER Directing Respondent to Respond to Petitioner's Objections signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 07/16/2021. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E) |
Filing 32 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 20 be granted and the petition be DISMISSED; Petitioner be DENIED a Certificate of Appealability re 20 Motion to Dismiss ; referred to Judge Ishii, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 03/16/2021. 9to F&R due within 30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 10 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:19-cv-1204 KJM DB) to Fresno (1:20-cv-1018 JDP) signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/22/2020. (Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Rood v. Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.