(HC) Ghafur v. The People of the State of California
| Khadijah Ghafur |
| The People of the State of California |
| 1:2020cv01123 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT dated *10/1/2020* pursuant to order #8 . (Rivera, O) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING #6 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING Petition and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/2020. Certificate of Appealability is declined. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #9 Judgment served on Khadijah Ghafur. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #6 by Petitioner Khadijah Ghafur. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss #1 Petition for Failure to Meet Custody Requirement signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/25/2020. Referred to Judge Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R due within Thirty (30) Days. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-01123-NONE-JDP(HC). (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Khadijah Ghafur. (Sant Agata, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Khadijah Ghafur. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Lundstrom, T) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Khadijah Ghafur signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/13/2020. (Lundstrom, T)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Khadijah Ghafur. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against The People of the State of California by Khadijah Ghafur. (Attachments: #1 Part 2). (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Ghafur v. The People of the State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Khadijah Ghafur | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: The People of the State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
