(HC) Yocom v. Attorney General
| Michael A. Yocom |
| Attorney General |
| 1:2020cv01141 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Without Prejudice #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/8/2020. Objections to F&R due within THIRTY DAYS. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-01141-DAD-SAB. (Marrujo, C) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #8 Findings and Recommendations (Motion) served on Michael A. Yocom. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 6
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Michael A. Yocom, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/18/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Michael A. Yocom. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Henshaw, R) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:20-cv-1600 KJN) to Fresno (1:20-cv-1141 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/14/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and #5 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Michael A. Yocom. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/14/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Michael A. Yocom. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to proceed forward on petition for writ of habeas corpus by Michael A. Yocom. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 8/13/2020 (Plummer, M). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Attorney General by Michael A. Yocom.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Yocom v. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Attorney General | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael A. Yocom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
