(HC) Luedtke v. Ciolli
| James Luedtke |
| A. Ciolli |
| 1:2020cv01148 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/05/2020. Consent or Decline due by 11/9/2020 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on James Luedtke. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Judge by James Luedtke. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 10 OBJECTIONS to #9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Petitioner James Luedtke. (Rivera, O) |
|
Filing 9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ; ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel and ORDER DENYING #3 Motion for Order; referred to Judge Drozd; New Case No. 1:20-cv-1148 DAD-EPG (HC),signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/11/2020. (Objections to F&R due within 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-1148 DAD-EPG (HC). (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Findings and Recommendations (Motion)and #8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on James Luedtke. (Martin-Gill, S) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to James Luedtke signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/18/2020. (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Petitioner's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #7 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE re Financial Affidavit by James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Recusal by James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order re Trust Account Statement by James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against A. Ciolli by James Luedtke. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Luedtke v. Ciolli | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Luedtke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: A. Ciolli | |
| Represented By: | Litigation Coordinator |
| Represented By: | Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel |
| Represented By: | US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
