Block v. Sandhu Investments Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Hendrik Block
Defendant: QCSI Six LLC, Sandhu Investments Inc. Doing business as 7-Eleven and QCSIF Six LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv01193
Filed: August 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Sandhu Investments Inc. served on 9/7/2020, answer due 9/28/2020. (Moore, Tanya)
October 7, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by QCSI Six LLC, QCSIF Six LLC. (Orr, Michael)
October 7, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by QCSI Six LLC, QCSIF Six LLC. Attorney Orr, Michael S. added.(Orr, Michael)
September 3, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: QCSIF Six LLC served on 8/27/2020, answer due 9/17/2020. (Moore, Tanya)
September 3, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: QCSI Six LLC served on 8/27/2020, answer due 9/17/2020. (Moore, Tanya)
August 24, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/8/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S)
August 24, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *QCSI Six LLC, QCSIF Six LLC, Sandhu Investments Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St., Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Martin-Gill, S)
August 21, 2020 RECEIPT number 0972-9069966 for $400.00 paid by Tanya E. Moore on 8/21/2020. (Marrujo, C)
August 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Hendrik Block. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Block v. Sandhu Investments Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QCSI Six LLC
Represented By: Julie Rae Trotter
Represented By: Michael S. Orr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandhu Investments Inc. Doing business as 7-Eleven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QCSIF Six LLC
Represented By: Julie Rae Trotter
Represented By: Michael S. Orr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hendrik Block
Represented By: Tanya E. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?