Schaupp et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
| Carolyn Schaupp, Carolyn Schaupp, Sr., L. S. and D. S. |
| Office of the District Attorney of Stanislaus County, Matthew Mercado, Clinton Armstrong, Gary Boyd, Galen Carroll, Kim Mallock, County of Stanislaus, Sandra Lucas, Kathryn Harwell, Cristina Magana, City of Modesto, Modesto Police Department, Edwardo Cortez, County of Stanislaus Child Protective Services, Birgit Fladager, Edward Izzo, Kyle Johnson, Superior Court of Stanislaus, Kimberly Underwood and Frank Sousa |
| 1:2020cv01221 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why the claims of Plaintiffs Carolyn Schaupp, S.R., L.S., D.S. and P.I. should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/13/2020. Show Cause Response due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/11/2020. Show Cause Response due within 14-Days.(Lundstrom, T)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #15 Order to Show Cause served on Carolyn Schaupp. (Lundstrom, T) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #16 Order to Show Cause served on Carolyn Schaupp. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 14 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/5/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 Informational Order) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Modesto Police Department, Office of the District Attorney of Stanislaus County, Superior Court of Stanislaus* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carolyn Schaupp* *416 Pederson Rd., #B* *Oakdale, CA 95361*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Modesto, County of Stanislaus, County of Stanislaus Child Protective Services* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carolyn Schaupp* *416 Pederson Rd., #B* *Oakdale, CA 95361*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sandra Lucas, Cristina Magana, Kim Mallock, Matthew Mercado, Frank Sousa, Kimberly Underwood* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carolyn Schaupp* *416 Pederson Rd., #B* *Oakdale, CA 95361*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Birgit Fladager, Kathryn Harwell, Edward Izzo, Kyle Johnson* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carolyn Schaupp* *416 Pederson Rd., #B* *Oakdale, CA 95361*. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Clinton Armstrong, Gary Boyd, Galen Carroll, Edwardo Cortez* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carolyn Schaupp* *416 Pederson Rd., #B* *Oakdale, CA 95361*. (Marrujo, C) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 Summons, #12 Summons, #11 Summons, #14 Civil New Case Documents for DAD, #10 Summons, #9 Summons served on Carolyn Schaupp. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff Carolyn Shaupp's #5 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/24/2020. (Marrujo, C)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion for TRO served on Carolyn Schaupp. (Marrujo, C) |
| RECEIPT number #CAE100046579 $400.00 fbo Carolyn Schaupp by Carolyn Schaupp on 9/17/2020. (Lundstrom, T) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff Carolyn Schaupp To File Long Form Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER Directing Plaintiff Carolyn Schaupp, Sr. To Submit Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Or Pay Filing Fee Within Thirty Days; ORDER Denying Plaintiff Carolyn Schaupps #6 Motion For Permission For Electronic Case Filing, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/3/2020. Thirty (30) Day Deadline (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Non-Prisoner (Long Form))(Marrujo, C)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order served on Carolyn Schaupp and Carolyn Schaupp, Sr at same address. (Marrujo, C) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing by Carolyn Schaupp. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Carolyn Schaupp. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Carolyn Schaupp Submitted in Support of Her Complaint. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Carolyn Schaupp. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clinton Armstrong, Gary Boyd, Galen Carroll, City of Modesto, Edwardo Cortez, County of Stanislaus, County of Stanislaus Child Protective Services, Birgit Fladager, Kathryn Harwell, Edward Izzo, Kyle Johnson, Sandra Lucas, Cristina Magana, Kim Mallock, Matthew Mercado, Modesto Police Department, Office of the District Attorney of Stanislaus County, Frank Sousa, Superior Court of Stanislaus, Kimberly Underwood by Carolyn Schaupp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
