Lasha Johnson v. City of Fresno
Lasha Johnson |
City of Fresno |
1:2020cv01320 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sheila K Oberto |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Fresno by Lasha Johnson.(Gehlawat, Neil) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/17/2020 is continued to 1/14/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/2/2020(Kusamura, W) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Re Plaintiff's Filing of First Amended Complaint by City of Fresno. Attorney O'Linn, Mildred K. added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Plaintiff's Filing of First Amended Complaint)(O'Linn, Mildred) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Carpenter, Lynn) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Lasha Johnson served on 10/16/2020, answer due 11/6/2020. (Gehlawat, Neil) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2020 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Fresno* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Neil Gehlawat* *Tayler & Ring* *1230 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 360* *Manhattan Beach, CA 90266*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Fresno by Lasha Johnson. Attorney Gehlawat, Neil added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Lasha Johnson Pursuant to CCP 377.32)(Gehlawat, Neil) |
RECEIPT number 0972-9116283 for $400.00 for Lasha Johnson from Gehlawat, Neil. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lasha Johnson v. City of Fresno | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Fresno | |
Represented By: | Mildred K. O'Linn |
Represented By: | Lynn L. Carpenter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lasha Johnson | |
Represented By: | John Cornell Taylor |
Represented By: | Neil Gehlawat |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.