Nieto v. Performance Food Group, Inc. et al
| Benny Nieto |
| Performance Food Group, Inc. and Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01408 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/16/2021.CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL of ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc., Performance Food Group, Inc.. (Kessler, Remy) |
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION and ORDER #12 Permitting Plaintiff Additional Time to File and Serve First Amended Complaint; ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/15/2020. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 3/1/2021 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for (1) PERMITTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE AND FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND (2) CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BASED ON PENDING SETTLEMENT OF ACTION by Benny Nieto. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Perlman, Douglas) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #9 Stipulation to Permit Plaintiff to Serve and File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/29/2020. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER re PERMITTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE AND FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Benny Nieto. (Perlman, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION PERMITTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE AND FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Benny Nieto. (Perlman, Douglas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER PERMITTING #7 Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/5/2020. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE AND FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc., Performance Food Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kessler, Remy) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Benny Nieto. (Perlman, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BY NOT MORE THAN 28 DAYS [L.R. 144(a)] by Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc., Performance Food Group, Inc.. (Kessler, Remy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of NONCOMPLIANCE With Electronic Filing Requirement (Local Rule 135(g)): Attorney Remy Joseph Kessler is directed to register for CM/ECF. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/4/2021 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 JLT Worksheet, #3 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #4 Consent Form, #5 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc., Performance Food Group, Inc.. (Kane, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kern County Superior Court, case number BCV-20-101906 by all defendants. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9157922) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kane, Matthew) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Notice of Noncompliance with Electronic Filing Requirement, #3 Civil New Case Documents for DAD served on Remy Joseph Kessler. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
