Scalia v. United States Postal Service
| Eugene Scalia |
| United States Postal Service |
| 1:2020cv01514 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Garcia, Norman) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: (Attachments: #1 Letter regarding service to USPS sent to DOJ in DC, #2 Certified mailing of USPS service sent to DOJ in DC, #3 Delivery of certified mailing for USPS sent to DOJ in DC)(Garcia, Norman) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: (Attachments: #1 Letter regarding service to USPS sent to USPS - DeJoy in DC, #2 Certified mailing to USPS - DeJoy in DC, #3 Delivery of certified Mailing to USPS - DeJoy in DC)(Garcia, Norman) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: (Attachments: #1 Letter regarding service to USPS sent to DOJ in Fresno, CA, #2 Certified maiing to DOJ in Fresno, CA for USPS, #3 USPS certified mail delivery to DOJ in Fresno, CA for USPS)(Garcia, Norman) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: United States Postal Service served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Letter regarding service to USPS in Madera, CA, #2 Certified mailing to USPS in Madera, CA, #3 USPS certified mail delivery to USPS in Madera, CA)(Garcia, Norman) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/9/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States Postal Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Norman Garcia* *90 7th Street* *Room 3-700* *San Francisco, CA 94103*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT by the Secretary of Labor, Eugene Scalia, U.S. Department of Labor against United States Postal Service by Eugene Scalia. Attorney Garcia, Norman added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garcia, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scalia v. United States Postal Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Scalia | |
| Represented By: | Norman Garcia, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
