(SS) Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Victor Renard Harrison |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv01558 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/14/2020: The parties are hereby notified that pursuant to General Order Number 615, attached hereto, this action has been stayed pending further order of the court. See E.D. Cal. G.O. No. 615, 6, 10. This stay does not prevent, and Plaintiff is directed to proceed with, service of process. (Text Only Entry) (Rooney, M)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Victor Renard Harrison. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 2/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM SS Instructions) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *12631 E. Imperial Highway* *Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670*. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/5/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Victor Renard Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security by Victor Renard Harrison. Attorney Rohlfing, Lawrence David added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of interested parties, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Sant Agata, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victor Renard Harrison | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence David Rohlfing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
