(SS) Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Antonio Feliciano |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv01627 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate filed by Plaintiff Antonio Feliciano. (Feld, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (McAdam, S.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ADVISING PARTIES OF STAY OF ACTION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 615, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/8/2020. (Apodaca, P)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/24/2020, answer due 12/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Feld, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 2/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Issue Service Documents and New Case Documents and Requiring Service of the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/17/2020. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Benjamin Paul Feld* *Ghitterman Ghitterman and Feld* *418 E. Canon Perdido St.* *Santa Barbara, CA 93101*. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE (text only): Pursuant to General Order 615, this action is STAYED pending further Order of the Court. No summons or briefing schedule will issue until the stay is lifted. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Antonio Feliciano. (Feld, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Antonio Feliciano (Feld, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Antonio Feliciano. Attorney Feld, Benjamin Paul added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9246325) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial)(Feld, Benjamin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Feliciano | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Paul Feld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | S. Wyeth McAdam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
